PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF EDUCATIONAL COMMUNICATION IN REGARDS TO NEW DIDACTIC PARADIGM
P. V. Menshikov
Tsiolkovskiy Kaluga State University, Kaluga, Russian Federation
Keywords: дидактическая коммуникация, коммуникативный подход, представления обучаемого, субъективная модель дидактической коммуникации, рефлексия обучаемого, educational communication, communicative approach, trainee’s notions, subjective model of the educational communication, trainee»s reflection
Abstract
The paper explores students» reflexive ideas about such aspects of didactic communication with a teacher as space and time of educational interaction (temporal-topological aspect), educational content, organizational model of communication, means and methods of interaction (interactive aspect), individual-personal features of communicators, relevant for educational interaction. The author compares students» opinions about ideal educational communication and their real estimation. The research aims at theoretical and empirical modeling of the construct «didactic communication». Research methods are seen as follows: theoretical and empirical modeling of the construct «didactic communication». The author applied inventory Psychological structure of the educational communication and the Constructivist test. The research was carried out with the second- and third-year students of Tsiolkovski Kaluga State University (Pedagogical Faculty). The author highlights that there are conjugate (coherent) statements on the sample of students» opinions on the preferred parameters of didactic communication with the teacher. The most desirable characteristics are seen as spatial-temporal, content and individual-personal aspects arranged in compliance with students» expectations. In their subjective assessments of real learning interaction, the subjects most highly noted the group modus of didactic communication, which is fully confirmed by an external criterion: the student community is actually a communicative network, and their communications are not confined to the student, on the contrary, are more addressed to fellow students. At the same time to assessing the real interactions our probationers have pointed to the feeling of low contribution and estrangement in communicative process control. Deficient activity in the educational interactions is partially compensated with the activity in the non-formal student communication.
|