Publishing House SB RAS:

Publishing House SB RAS:

Address of the Publishing House SB RAS:
Morskoy pr. 2, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia



Advanced Search

"Philosophy of Education"

2020 year, number 1

MODEL OF A UNIFIED EDUCATIONAL SPACE AND(OR) PRESERVATION OF THE NATIONAL EDUCATION SYSTEM?

M. A. Abramova
Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
Keywords: международные сравнительные исследования, качество образования, стандарты обучения, рейтинг, национальная система образования, модель, international comparative studies, quality of education, training standards, rating, national education system, model

Abstract

Introduction. The article raises the problem of reflection of the goals and objectives of educational process management in Russia on the example of the adoption and use of ratings of international studies of countries in the field of education. Methodology and methods of the research. The analysis is based on an interdisciplinary approach using qualitative and quantitative research methodology, as well as a systematic approach that provides the possibility of analyzing the subject of research as an integral developing structure embedded in other system-structural formations. Under the quality assessment system in the field of education, we understand a set of tools that regulate the institutional behavior of participants in the educational process (schools, universities) to achieve results. The results of the research. Based on the previously conducted analysis of the quality of higher education and the implementation of digitalization programs, this article focuses on the use of methods of General education research and the creation of a unified system for assessing the quality of education in Russia (ESS). The author compares the goals of the State program of the Russian Federation «development of education» with the PISA indicators that determine the level of functional literacy of adolescents. It is concluded that despite the obvious benefits of conducting cross-country research, the state program does not form a vision of its own understanding of development goals and objectives Conclusion. Replacing the qualitative description of learning outcomes with quantitative evaluation parameters using international ratings helps to level the value of the experience of the Russian education system and, moreover, does not create conditions for the preservation and development of Russia’s cultural potential. The revealed violations of logic in the procedure for assessing the impact of all stages of the educational process, starting with the definition of the goal, focus attention on the need to introduce a new parameter-an assessment of the managerial impact that allowed or prevented the harmonious development of the education system.