Publishing House SB RAS:

Publishing House SB RAS:

Address of the Publishing House SB RAS:
Morskoy pr. 2, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia



Advanced Search

Thermophysics and Aeromechanics

2017 year, number 4

The surface roughness effect on the performance of supersonic ejectors

D.V. Brezgin1, K.E. Aronson1, F. Mazzelli2, and A. Milazzo2

1Ural Federal University named after the First President of RussiaВ  B.N. Eltsin: Ural Power Engineering Institute, Ekaterinburg, Russia

2University of Florence, Florence, Italy

E-mail: k.e.aronson@urfu.ru
Keywords: supersonic ejector, entrainment ratio, CFD, wall log-law, sand-grain roughness
Pages: 553–561

Abstract

The paper presents the numerical simulation results of the surface roughness influence on gas-dynamic processes inside flow parts of a supersonic ejector. These simulations are performed using two commercial CFD solvers (Star-CCM+ and Fluent). The results are compared to each other and verified by a full-scale experiment in terms of global flow parameters (the entrainment ratio: the ratio between secondary to primary mass flow rate - ER hereafter) and local flow parameters distribution (the static pressure distribution along the mixing chamber and diffuser walls). A detailed comparative study of the employed methods and approaches in both CFD packages is carried out in order to estimate the roughness effect on the logarithmic law velocity distribution inside the boundary layer. Influence of the surface roughness is compared with the influence of the backpressure (static pressure at the ejector outlet). It has been found out that increasing either the ejector backpressure or the surface roughness height, the shock position displaces upstream. Moreover, the numerical simulation results of an ejector with rough walls in the both CFD solvers are well quantitatively agreed with each other in terms of the mean ER and well qualitatively agree in terms of the local flow parameters distribution. It is found out that in the case of exceeding the “critical roughness height” for the given boundary conditions and ejector’s geometry, the ejector switches to the “off-design” mode and its performance decreases considerably.

DOI: 10.1134/S0869864317040060