DISTRIBUTED VORTEX-ROUGHNESS RECEPTIVITY OF A SWEPT-WING BOUNDARY LAYER. PART 2. RECEPTIVITY CHARACTERISTICS
V. I. Borodulin, Yu. S. Kachanov, A. P. Roshchektaev
Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
Keywords: laminar boundary layer, swept wing, freestream vortex, surface undulation, cross-flow instability wave excitation, distributed boundary-layer receptivity coefficient
Abstract
The distributed receptivity of a swept-wing laminar boundary layer to unsteady freestream vortices with a longitudinally oriented vorticity vector in the presence of uniform spanwise surface undulations is experimentally investigated. Experiments are performed on a 25° swept-wing model under fully controlled disturbance conditions. Unsteady longitudinal freestream vortices are found to induce highly efficient distributed (in the streamwise direction) excitation of unsteady cross-flow instability modes at combination spanwise wavenumbers. This excitation results from vortex scattering by surface inhomogeneities. Part 1 of this study (published in the previous issue of the journal) describes the experimental approach and its theoretical justification; the experimental setup; the mean flow structure; the method of disturbance generation; the characteristics of freestream and surface disturbances; experimental evidence for the high efficiency of the investigated receptivity mechanism; the important role of longitudinal wavenumber resonance in exciting the most amplified cross-flow instability modes. Part 2 of this study (the present paper) presents the experimental determination of the amplitudes and phases of the distributed vortex-roughness receptivity coefficients as functions of disturbance frequency and spanwise wavenumber. Receptivity coefficients responsible for cross-flow wave excitation on a smooth surface are also obtained, and the relative efficiencies of the distributed vortex receptivity and vortex-roughness receptivity mechanisms are compared. The results are further compared with those previously reported for distributed vortex receptivity on a smooth surface.
|