CONSTITUTIVE METHOD OF E. HUSSERL’S PHENOMENOLOGY IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (REFLECTIONS ON HEURISTICS). Part I
Danila Vladimirovich Malakhov
Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Republic of Belarus
Keywords: Husserl, phenomenology, philosophy of science, constitution, intentionality, sense, temporality, intersubjectivity, transcendental Ego
Abstract
The article deals with the heuristics of Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology and the phenomenological method of constitution in relation to modern philosophy, methodology and history of science. Recognizing the ambiguous fate of phenomenology as a conception of the transcendental foundations of positive sciences, the author attempts to define the sphere in which the phenomenological eidetics of intentional, temporal, genetic and intersubjective constitution would have an effect as a demanded part of scientific knowledge. The personal dimension of scientific creativity is chosen as such a sphere. This is justified by the priority consideration of intersubjective constitution, which carries out the temporal and eidetic correlation of various consciousnesses, including in the mode of their mutual intellectual empathy and modernization. The proposed approach is aimed at transforming fragmentary and purely informative knowledge on the history of science into its temporal-eidetic continuum, in which the personal destinies and ideas of great scientists would be perceived and experienced as modern and necessary for scientific creativity, cognitive psychology and philosophy of education.,
|
