INTERFACIAL INDUCED POLARIZATION AND ITS MANIFESTATION IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTROMAGNETIC PROSPECTING METHODS
N.O. Kozhevnikov1
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
Novosibirsk, Russia
Keywords: interfacial polarization, the Maxwell-Wagner effect, voltage source, current source, induced polarization and time domain electromagnetic prospecting methods
Abstract
The article, by the example of a layered model which can be reduced to the equivalent two-layer one illustrates the differences in the frequency and transient responses of interfacial polarization depending on which source – current or voltage – is used to excite the ground in electrical and EM geophysical prospecting methods. In materials science, a voltage source is usually used to study interfacial polarization. In this case, the manifestations of interfacial polarization are known as the Maxwell-Wagner effect. As for the geophysical induced polarization method, it uses a current source to energize the ground, which causes frequency and transient responses of the interface polarization to differ from those predicted by the Maxwell-Wagner theory. In principle, using the interface polarization frequency or transient responses measured with both current and voltage sources, one can find all parameters of the equivalent two-layered model. Unfortunately, polarization of grounding electrodes complicates in-situ studies of the Maxwell-Wagner effect using a grounded source. There is no such a problem in the time domain electromagnetic prospecting method: when the current in the transmitter loop is switched off, a vortex electric field is induced in the ground, which – in terms of the circuit theory – is equivalent to using the voltage source.
|