TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF ADAPTATION AS A FORM OF CULTURAL IDENTIFICATION OF PERSON
E. B. Baboshina
Kurgan State University, 640020, Russia, Kurgan, st. Sovetskaia, 63
Keywords: идентификация личности, социализация, культурация, человек культуры, социальная адаптация, культурная идентификация, социально-культурное становление, философия культуры, образование, identity, socialization, cultural adaptation, person of culture, social adaptation, cultural identification, socio-cultural development, philosophy of culture and education
Abstract
The article reveals the approaches to studying the features of adaptation. The problem of identification is analyzed based on the studied features of human adaptation in the society (L. S. Vygotsky, E. Durkheim, E. Fromm, V. A. Yadov and others). The author analyzes identification not so much as a problem of physical and mental adaptation, but as a socio-cultural formation of the person. The idea. The researcher proposes separation of social adaptation into the issues of socialization and culturation for a more objective analysis of these complex processes, due to their frequent inconsistencies in practice. To do this, we offer to assume an axiological position. The author proves the need for a holistic anthropological knowledge about the formation of the individual in the society to counter the negative social technologies, which produce «questionable» values and norms in the consciousness of the person. The author pays attention to the culture of the personality entering the society. We offer some important principles and mechanisms of the process. The author adheres to the domestic approach to understanding adaptation and culturation (L. S. Vygotsky, I. I. Krupnik, E. S. Markarian, S. V. Lurie, and others). The author, though not cites references to the works of other scientists (O.G. Drobnitsky, I. G. Ionin, N. M. Lebedeva) and foreign philosophers (M. Buber, E. Fromm, M. Heidegger, E. Erikson and others), but takes into account the results of their works in logic and in the content of the vision of problem. The theoretical meaning. The author proves the importance of building mentality-forming structures in assistance to the cultural identity formation of the person as not a passive, but active participant in the process of evolution, emphasizes a special role of education. The novelty lies in defining the features of socialization of the modern person, influencing the form and content of its cultural identity. The leading methods are the analysis of philosophical, cultural, pedagogical and psychological research; hermeneutic method; generalization, abstraction, the ascent from the abstract to the specific, deduction, synthesis. The practical significance lies in the proposed understanding of the possibilities of improvement of cultural identification in the identification of additional targets and mechanisms of education, which are based on developing knowledge of the philosophy of culture, which in this case as a «platform» in the evolution of society is enriched by the position of the awareness of the need of the meta value and meta scientific study of social adaptation.
|
