Publishing House SB RAS:

Publishing House SB RAS:

Address of the Publishing House SB RAS:
Morskoy pr. 2, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia



Advanced Search

Russian Geology and Geophysics

2014 year, number 1

LATE PALEOZOIC GEOMAGNETIC–FIELD ESTIMATES FROM PALEOMAGNETIC STUDIES OF PERMIAN LAVAS IN NORTHEASTERN KAZAKHSTAN

M.L. Bazhenov1, R. Van der Voo2, J.J. Meert3, N.M. Levashova1, I.S. Ipat’eva1
1Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevskii per. 7, Moscow, 119017, Russia
2Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, 2534C.C. Little Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
3Department of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
Keywords: Geomagnetism, paleomagnetism, Paleozoic, thick lava series, geomagnetic-field characteristics

Abstract

Paleomagnetic studies of thick lava series are one of the most reliable sources of data on the ancient geomagnetic field. However, most of such data are younger than 5 Ma, with much fewer results on the rest of the Cenozoic and the Mesozoic. Two wholesome results are available for the Precambrian but none for the Paleozoic. Late Permian basalts and rhyolites from northeastern Kazakhstan were studied to obtain first estimates of the geomagnetic-field characteristics during that period. We present preliminary results on part of the collection (66 flows (sites)) from a section ~1600 m thick. The characteristic component of reversed polarity was isolated by stepwise demagnetization at all the sites with a slight error. This component is of prefolding age and, most likely, primary. No abnormal magnetization direction is observed in the data, and the average directions of the characteristic component at the sites are tightly clustered ( D = 243.3º; I = –57.0º, k = 79.1; α 95 = 2.0º; 65 sites). As compared with the published data on Cenozoic and Mesozoic thick lava series, secular variation was much weaker in the Late Permian than in the Mesozoic or Cenozoic, and the geomagnetic field was less disturbed. Secular-variation models based on the Late Cenozoic data show even more dramatic differences.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2013.12.009