MONOPROFILE MUNICIPAL FORMATION (MONOCITY): SPECIFICS OF THE RUSSIAN AND FOREIGN CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
S.V. Kulay
Prokopievsk branch of T.F. Gorbachev Kuzbass State Technical University, Nogradskaya str., 32, Prokopyevsk, Kemerovo region, 653039
Keywords: моногород, монопрофильное муниципальное образование, моноотраслевой город, градообразующее предприятие, рынок труда, зависимость экономики, признаки моногорода, monocity, monoprofile municipal formation, monoindustrial city, city-forming enterprise, labor market, dependence of economy, signs of monocity
Abstract
The article studies and discusses the issue of absence of clear definition of the ‘monocity’ category in the normative legal base in the conditions of fairly commonness of monocities in the Russian Federation. Modern scientific approaches to the definition of ‘monocity’ are analyzed, its essential characteristics are considered. Synonymic categories used in Russia and abroad are presented. No generally accepted approaches to the definition were revealed, however the main elements of the definition were marked out. A universal interpretation of the concept of monoprofile municipal formation (monocity) was formed on the basis of the research; the main signs of monocity were marked out.
|
